<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 313 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424758</link>
    <description>The tribunal admitted the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, finding the Operational Creditor had proven its case. A moratorium was declared, and an Interim Resolution Professional was appointed. The IRP was tasked with convening a creditors&#039; meeting and submitting a resolution plan within 105 days. The Operational Creditor was directed to deposit funds for preliminary expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 09:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 313 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424758</link>
      <description>The tribunal admitted the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, finding the Operational Creditor had proven its case. A moratorium was declared, and an Interim Resolution Professional was appointed. The IRP was tasked with convening a creditors&#039; meeting and submitting a resolution plan within 105 days. The Operational Creditor was directed to deposit funds for preliminary expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>