<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Examines Tax Liability Statement Validity Under SVLDRS 3; No Refunds for Overpayments Per Section 130(2) of 2019 Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64497</link>
    <description>Validity of statement issued in prescribed form SVLDRS 3 - tax liability that was due and payable - setting off of amounts already paid towards tax - if a declarant has made a pre-deposit or other deposits which exceed the amount payable, as indicated in the statement issued by the designated committee, the said amount shall not be refunded as per provisions of sub-section (2) of section 130 of 2019 Act. - the pre-deposit made by the petitioner is less than the amount stated in the impugned statement and therefore, in this matter, the petitioner steers clear of the aforesaid provision - the construction of provisions of section 123 (d) cannot enure to the benefit of the revenue. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 09:33:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 09:33:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Examines Tax Liability Statement Validity Under SVLDRS 3; No Refunds for Overpayments Per Section 130(2) of 2019 Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64497</link>
      <description>Validity of statement issued in prescribed form SVLDRS 3 - tax liability that was due and payable - setting off of amounts already paid towards tax - if a declarant has made a pre-deposit or other deposits which exceed the amount payable, as indicated in the statement issued by the designated committee, the said amount shall not be refunded as per provisions of sub-section (2) of section 130 of 2019 Act. - the pre-deposit made by the petitioner is less than the amount stated in the impugned statement and therefore, in this matter, the petitioner steers clear of the aforesaid provision - the construction of provisions of section 123 (d) cannot enure to the benefit of the revenue. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 09:33:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>