<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 307 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424752</link>
    <description>In voluntary disclosure under the Sabka Vishwas scheme, &quot;tax dues&quot; were read to mean only the outstanding duty remaining after crediting amounts already paid before the scheme commenced. The Court rejected a construction that would treat discharged liability as still payable, holding that such an approach would be unreasonable and would permit collection without authority of law. It further held that the designated committee had to take the petitioner&#039;s pre-deposits into account and issue a fresh SVLDRS-3 statement. The impugned statement was set aside and the matter remitted for redetermination after giving credit for prior payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 307 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424752</link>
      <description>In voluntary disclosure under the Sabka Vishwas scheme, &quot;tax dues&quot; were read to mean only the outstanding duty remaining after crediting amounts already paid before the scheme commenced. The Court rejected a construction that would treat discharged liability as still payable, holding that such an approach would be unreasonable and would permit collection without authority of law. It further held that the designated committee had to take the petitioner&#039;s pre-deposits into account and issue a fresh SVLDRS-3 statement. The impugned statement was set aside and the matter remitted for redetermination after giving credit for prior payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>