<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 2036 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303193</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court confirmed the conviction and sentencing under Sections 279 and 304-A of the IPC. The Court emphasized compliance with Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, directing that the sentences for both offenses run concurrently. The Court upheld the convictions but modified the sentencing order for clarity and procedural compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 21:22:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 2036 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303193</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court confirmed the conviction and sentencing under Sections 279 and 304-A of the IPC. The Court emphasized compliance with Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, directing that the sentences for both offenses run concurrently. The Court upheld the convictions but modified the sentencing order for clarity and procedural compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>