https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303193 Section 31 CrPC requires the sentencing court, where a person is convicted of more than one offence in the same trial, to specify whether the terms of imprisonment will run concurrently or consecutively. The sentencing order omitted that direction, and the omission was treated as an error that should have been corrected in appeal and revision; the substantive sentences were therefore directed to run concurrently. On the merits, no sufficient basis was shown to disturb the concurrent findings of three courts that had accepted the prosecution case, so the conviction and sentence were otherwise upheld. en-us Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2022 21:22:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303193 Section 31 CrPC requires the sentencing court, where a person is convicted of more than one offence in the same trial, to specify whether the terms of imprisonment will run concurrently or consecutively. The sentencing order omitted that direction, and the omission was treated as an error that should have been corrected in appeal and revision; the substantive sentences were therefore directed to run concurrently. On the merits, no sufficient basis was shown to disturb the concurrent findings of three courts that had accepted the prosecution case, so the conviction and sentence were otherwise upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303193