https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303177 The High Court rejected the appellant's request for concurrent sentencing under Section 427 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving multiple convictions. The Supreme Court held that since Section 427 was not invoked during the original cases or appeals, the High Court could not exercise its inherent jurisdiction to grant concurrent sentencing. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit as the separate application filed after the dismissal of special leave petitions was deemed not maintainable. en-us Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2022 17:17:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303177 The High Court rejected the appellant's request for concurrent sentencing under Section 427 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving multiple convictions. The Supreme Court held that since Section 427 was not invoked during the original cases or appeals, the High Court could not exercise its inherent jurisdiction to grant concurrent sentencing. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit as the separate application filed after the dismissal of special leave petitions was deemed not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303177