https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303177 An independent application under Sections 482 and 427 CrPC seeking concurrency of sentences was held not maintainable after the convictions, appeals and special leave petitions had attained finality. Section 427 applies when a person already undergoing imprisonment is later sentenced on a subsequent conviction, and no concurrency direction had been sought or granted in the original trials or appeals. The Court held that inherent powers under Section 482 cannot be used to create such relief after final disposal of the criminal proceedings. The request for the two sentences to run concurrently was therefore rejected. en-us Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2022 17:17:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303177 An independent application under Sections 482 and 427 CrPC seeking concurrency of sentences was held not maintainable after the convictions, appeals and special leave petitions had attained finality. Section 427 applies when a person already undergoing imprisonment is later sentenced on a subsequent conviction, and no concurrency direction had been sought or granted in the original trials or appeals. The Court held that inherent powers under Section 482 cannot be used to create such relief after final disposal of the criminal proceedings. The request for the two sentences to run concurrently was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303177