<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1212 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303176</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the criminal revision petition, setting aside the dismissal of the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the complainant&#039;s absence during the recording of the sworn statement. The Court emphasized the importance of giving the complainant a chance to present their case and directed the complainant to appear before the Magistrate within a specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 16:12:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1212 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303176</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the criminal revision petition, setting aside the dismissal of the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the complainant&#039;s absence during the recording of the sworn statement. The Court emphasized the importance of giving the complainant a chance to present their case and directed the complainant to appear before the Magistrate within a specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>