https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303172 Compensation in land acquisition on an annual yield basis was treated as legally requiring a 10-year multiplier, though the award was left undisturbed on the special facts and the Court stated that the departure would not serve as precedent. The Court also held that the Land Acquisition Amendment Act, 1984 applied only where the Reference Court proceedings were pending on or after the amendment's commencement; because the Reference Court award predated the amendment, the claimants could not claim the enhanced solatium, additional amount, or amended interest provisions. They were confined to the benefits available under the local amendment, including 15 per cent solatium and 5 per cent interest on enhanced compensation. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:56:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303172 Compensation in land acquisition on an annual yield basis was treated as legally requiring a 10-year multiplier, though the award was left undisturbed on the special facts and the Court stated that the departure would not serve as precedent. The Court also held that the Land Acquisition Amendment Act, 1984 applied only where the Reference Court proceedings were pending on or after the amendment's commencement; because the Reference Court award predated the amendment, the claimants could not claim the enhanced solatium, additional amount, or amended interest provisions. They were confined to the benefits available under the local amendment, including 15 per cent solatium and 5 per cent interest on enhanced compensation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303172