<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 419 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303171</link>
    <description>Compensation for acquired land and fruit-bearing trees cannot be valued separately in a way that results in double assessment of the land&#039;s worth. Where market value is determined on a yield basis, a suitable multiplier must be applied; the text notes an 8-year multiplier for fruit-bearing trees and a 12-year multiplier for agricultural land. It also states that the High Court enhanced compensation without correcting the valuation method or the multiplier adopted by the Collector, and that further enhancement on the basis of price index was unjustified. The reference court&#039;s award was restored and the High Court&#039;s enhancement was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:52:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 419 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303171</link>
      <description>Compensation for acquired land and fruit-bearing trees cannot be valued separately in a way that results in double assessment of the land&#039;s worth. Where market value is determined on a yield basis, a suitable multiplier must be applied; the text notes an 8-year multiplier for fruit-bearing trees and a 12-year multiplier for agricultural land. It also states that the High Court enhanced compensation without correcting the valuation method or the multiplier adopted by the Collector, and that further enhancement on the basis of price index was unjustified. The reference court&#039;s award was restored and the High Court&#039;s enhancement was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>