https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424743 The Patiala House Courts-DSC granted anticipatory bail to the applicant in a GST case involving wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit worth approximately Rs. 40 crores. The court relied on Tarun Jain v. DGGI precedent, holding that custodial interrogation was neither warranted nor statutorily provided for under Section 132(c). The court noted that evidence was documentary in nature and detention would adversely impact the petitioner's business without serving any purpose. Anticipatory bail was granted on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with surety. en-us Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 12:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424743 The Patiala House Courts-DSC granted anticipatory bail to the applicant in a GST case involving wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit worth approximately Rs. 40 crores. The court relied on Tarun Jain v. DGGI precedent, holding that custodial interrogation was neither warranted nor statutorily provided for under Section 132(c). The court noted that evidence was documentary in nature and detention would adversely impact the petitioner's business without serving any purpose. Anticipatory bail was granted on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with surety. Case-Laws GST Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424743