<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 284 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424729</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed the petitions challenging the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the availability of the alternative remedy of appeal before the Commissioner. The court highlighted the limitations of a writ petition in cases where an appeal process exists and underscored the appellate authority&#039;s competence in assessing the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 09:06:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 284 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424729</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissed the petitions challenging the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the availability of the alternative remedy of appeal before the Commissioner. The court highlighted the limitations of a writ petition in cases where an appeal process exists and underscored the appellate authority&#039;s competence in assessing the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>