https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424728 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Commissioner's order dated 29.03.2001. The petitioner was not entitled to claim refunds based on the deductions of income disclosed under VDIS from the regular income tax returns. The court emphasized that the tax paid under VDIS is non-refundable and distinct from regular income tax, and the petitioner could not benefit from both schemes simultaneously. en-us Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424728 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Commissioner's order dated 29.03.2001. The petitioner was not entitled to claim refunds based on the deductions of income disclosed under VDIS from the regular income tax returns. The court emphasized that the tax paid under VDIS is non-refundable and distinct from regular income tax, and the petitioner could not benefit from both schemes simultaneously. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424728