<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 278 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of depreciation on movable assets and taxation of compensation received. The decision emphasized the significance of lease agreements in determining tax liabilities and the necessity of explicit contractual provisions for separating assets for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 09:06:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 278 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of depreciation on movable assets and taxation of compensation received. The decision emphasized the significance of lease agreements in determining tax liabilities and the necessity of explicit contractual provisions for separating assets for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>