<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 277 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made under Section 2(22)(e) of the IT Act. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the transactions in question were part of their regular business dealings with the company and did not qualify as deemed dividends under the provisions of Section 2(22)(e).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 277 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made under Section 2(22)(e) of the IT Act. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the transactions in question were part of their regular business dealings with the company and did not qualify as deemed dividends under the provisions of Section 2(22)(e).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>