https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424694 The court addressed the import of goods without proper labeling under the BIS Act, 2016, leading to actions under the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeal) modified the order, allowing labeling instead of re-export. Despite court directions, respondents failed to comply, leading to enforcement actions. Discrepancies in filed affidavits were noted, and the court emphasized proper affirmation. The respondent department filed an appeal and stay application, with the court stressing prompt service to the petitioner. Non-compliance could result in contempt proceedings, highlighting the need for adherence to court directives. The judgment was disposed of with liberty to apply for further actions. en-us Mon, 04 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424694 The court addressed the import of goods without proper labeling under the BIS Act, 2016, leading to actions under the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeal) modified the order, allowing labeling instead of re-export. Despite court directions, respondents failed to comply, leading to enforcement actions. Discrepancies in filed affidavits were noted, and the court emphasized proper affirmation. The respondent department filed an appeal and stay application, with the court stressing prompt service to the petitioner. Non-compliance could result in contempt proceedings, highlighting the need for adherence to court directives. The judgment was disposed of with liberty to apply for further actions. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424694