<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 230 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424675</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the impugned order. It held that the appellant was not liable for the dues of M/s Roma Industries as per the undertaking given at the time of cancellation of Central Excise registration. The Tribunal granted a refund to the appellant along with interest, stating that the revenue had wrongly collected the dues related to M/s Roma Industries. The judgment was pronounced on 06.07.2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 09:03:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 230 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424675</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the impugned order. It held that the appellant was not liable for the dues of M/s Roma Industries as per the undertaking given at the time of cancellation of Central Excise registration. The Tribunal granted a refund to the appellant along with interest, stating that the revenue had wrongly collected the dues related to M/s Roma Industries. The judgment was pronounced on 06.07.2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>