https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424674 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and allowing their appeals with consequential relief. It found that there was no evidence to support the allegations of clandestine activities, emphasizing the importance of material evidence and the reliability of statements in determining liability. The tribunal rejected the confiscation of goods and machines, penalties imposed on various appellants, and demands of duty and penalties on M/s MSS Food Processors due to lack of substantiated evidence. en-us Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2022 09:03:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424674 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and allowing their appeals with consequential relief. It found that there was no evidence to support the allegations of clandestine activities, emphasizing the importance of material evidence and the reliability of statements in determining liability. The tribunal rejected the confiscation of goods and machines, penalties imposed on various appellants, and demands of duty and penalties on M/s MSS Food Processors due to lack of substantiated evidence. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424674