https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424673 Repeated opportunities to respond to pre-assessment notices and a communicated limit on further extension were treated as sufficient compliance with natural justice, so the challenge to the assessment on that ground failed. The claim that the entire tax liability had already been discharged by the contractor was treated as a disputed question of fact requiring verification of the contract scope, value and respective liabilities, and was therefore not decided in writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy for determination of the surviving issues, including any question of pre-deposit. en-us Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2022 09:02:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424673 Repeated opportunities to respond to pre-assessment notices and a communicated limit on further extension were treated as sufficient compliance with natural justice, so the challenge to the assessment on that ground failed. The claim that the entire tax liability had already been discharged by the contractor was treated as a disputed question of fact requiring verification of the contract scope, value and respective liabilities, and was therefore not decided in writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy for determination of the surviving issues, including any question of pre-deposit. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424673