<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 228 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424673</link>
    <description>The court upheld the assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 for the specific periods, rejecting claims of violation of natural justice. It was determined that the petitioner had potential tax liability due to their involvement in construction activities, despite the contractor&#039;s tax remittance. The court directed the petitioner to pursue a statutory appeal within three weeks and instructed the respondent to assess the tax liability within the same period. If no liability was found, the appeals could proceed without pre-deposit; otherwise, compliance with pre-deposit conditions was mandated. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and related petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 09:02:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 228 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424673</link>
      <description>The court upheld the assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 for the specific periods, rejecting claims of violation of natural justice. It was determined that the petitioner had potential tax liability due to their involvement in construction activities, despite the contractor&#039;s tax remittance. The court directed the petitioner to pursue a statutory appeal within three weeks and instructed the respondent to assess the tax liability within the same period. If no liability was found, the appeals could proceed without pre-deposit; otherwise, compliance with pre-deposit conditions was mandated. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and related petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>