<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1924 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303158</link>
    <description>Vicarious criminal liability for dishonour of cheque cannot be presumed from a person&#039;s status as partner or director alone. A complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act must specifically aver that the accused was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business at the relevant time; without those foundational facts, cognizance is unsustainable. On the stated facts, the complaint lacked the necessary specific averments against the petitioner, so the High Court quashed the complaint.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 22:00:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1924 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303158</link>
      <description>Vicarious criminal liability for dishonour of cheque cannot be presumed from a person&#039;s status as partner or director alone. A complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act must specifically aver that the accused was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business at the relevant time; without those foundational facts, cognizance is unsustainable. On the stated facts, the complaint lacked the necessary specific averments against the petitioner, so the High Court quashed the complaint.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>