https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303164 Maintainability of a Section 9 arbitration petition was kept in abeyance because the issue depended on an NCLAT order already under challenge before the Supreme Court, and no stay operated against that order. The Bombay High Court therefore stayed the impugned order rejecting maintainability, noting that the appellant's challenge remained pending at the Supreme Court and that the parties could seek an early hearing after that decision. The interlocutory application was disposed of on that basis. en-us Tue, 04 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2022 22:00:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303164 Maintainability of a Section 9 arbitration petition was kept in abeyance because the issue depended on an NCLAT order already under challenge before the Supreme Court, and no stay operated against that order. The Bombay High Court therefore stayed the impugned order rejecting maintainability, noting that the appellant's challenge remained pending at the Supreme Court and that the parties could seek an early hearing after that decision. The interlocutory application was disposed of on that basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303164