https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303151 The Revisional Court allowed the respondent's discharge applications under Section 245(2) and 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, overturning the trial court's decision. The court emphasized the lack of evidence linking the respondent to the cheque issuance at the time. However, it highlighted the prima facie evidence against the respondent as Chairman and Director of the company, indicating his responsibility for its business affairs. The court stressed that factual disputes, such as the resignation date, should be resolved after evidence is recorded, not at the preliminary stage. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2022 15:33:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303151 The Revisional Court allowed the respondent's discharge applications under Section 245(2) and 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, overturning the trial court's decision. The court emphasized the lack of evidence linking the respondent to the cheque issuance at the time. However, it highlighted the prima facie evidence against the respondent as Chairman and Director of the company, indicating his responsibility for its business affairs. The court stressed that factual disputes, such as the resignation date, should be resolved after evidence is recorded, not at the preliminary stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303151