https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303150 The Court quashed the complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the petitioner, as he was not a Director at the time of the alleged offence, did not receive statutory notice, and specific allegations against him were lacking. The Court found the continuation of proceedings against him to be an abuse of process and allowed the petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2022 15:29:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303150 The Court quashed the complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the petitioner, as he was not a Director at the time of the alleged offence, did not receive statutory notice, and specific allegations against him were lacking. The Court found the continuation of proceedings against him to be an abuse of process and allowed the petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303150