https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303148 The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the trial judge's order. The court determined that there was no concluded agreement for sale between the Commissioner of Partition and the appellants due to lack of mutual assent on all material terms. The Commissioner was deemed entitled to consider a higher offer received subsequently, and alleged irregularities in the sale proceedings were found invalid. The court directed a fresh sale between the appellants and the new offerer, emphasizing the importance of the higher offer. The absence of earnest money did not impact the finding of no binding agreement. en-us Mon, 22 Aug 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2022 14:24:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303148 The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the trial judge's order. The court determined that there was no concluded agreement for sale between the Commissioner of Partition and the appellants due to lack of mutual assent on all material terms. The Commissioner was deemed entitled to consider a higher offer received subsequently, and alleged irregularities in the sale proceedings were found invalid. The court directed a fresh sale between the appellants and the new offerer, emphasizing the importance of the higher offer. The absence of earnest money did not impact the finding of no binding agreement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Aug 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303148