https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303145 The court held that there was a completed contract upon the unconditional acceptance of the defendant's tender. The contract complied with Section 175(3) of the Government of India Act, 1935. There was no mutual mistake regarding the nature of the work, and impossibility of performance was rejected. The quantum of damages was recalculated based on rates offered by the next lowest tenderer, with a penalty disallowed. The appeal was allowed in part, modifying the lower court's order on costs. en-us Sat, 09 Nov 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2022 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303145 The court held that there was a completed contract upon the unconditional acceptance of the defendant's tender. The contract complied with Section 175(3) of the Government of India Act, 1935. There was no mutual mistake regarding the nature of the work, and impossibility of performance was rejected. The quantum of damages was recalculated based on rates offered by the next lowest tenderer, with a penalty disallowed. The appeal was allowed in part, modifying the lower court's order on costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 09 Nov 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303145