<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 38 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29418</link>
    <description>Maintenance paid to the assessee&#039;s adoptive mothers was held to be diverted by overriding title, not a mere application of income, because the liability arose from a statutory order under Section 9 of the Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act, 1951 and was recognised by a civil court decree. The right to maintenance was treated as a pre-existing charge attached to the late jagirdar&#039;s property, so the income never vested absolutely in the assessee before payment and was subject to a legal obligation at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:51:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 38 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29418</link>
      <description>Maintenance paid to the assessee&#039;s adoptive mothers was held to be diverted by overriding title, not a mere application of income, because the liability arose from a statutory order under Section 9 of the Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act, 1951 and was recognised by a civil court decree. The right to maintenance was treated as a pre-existing charge attached to the late jagirdar&#039;s property, so the income never vested absolutely in the assessee before payment and was subject to a legal obligation at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>