<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Questions Minority Oppression Claim After 20-Year Delay; Suggests Malicious Retaliation Intent in Document Fabrication Allegations.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64453</link>
    <description>Oppression of minority - The record also would disclose that the Annual Returns were filed by the Company from 2002-2014 and the said returns were also signed by the complainant showing the shareholding of the petitioner in PARPL company. The complainant did not choose to dispute the said Annual Returns and kept quiet for more than a decade. The filing of the complaint after twenty years alleging fabrication from the year 2002 onwards would only show that it was filed with a malafide intention to take revenge against the petitioner. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 11:35:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 11:35:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Questions Minority Oppression Claim After 20-Year Delay; Suggests Malicious Retaliation Intent in Document Fabrication Allegations.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64453</link>
      <description>Oppression of minority - The record also would disclose that the Annual Returns were filed by the Company from 2002-2014 and the said returns were also signed by the complainant showing the shareholding of the petitioner in PARPL company. The complainant did not choose to dispute the said Annual Returns and kept quiet for more than a decade. The filing of the complaint after twenty years alleging fabrication from the year 2002 onwards would only show that it was filed with a malafide intention to take revenge against the petitioner. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 11:35:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>