<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 215 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424660</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision regarding the cost of acquisition for capital gains tax calculation, emphasizing the legislative language and rejecting the contention based on voluntary valuation. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the authorities&#039; findings and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 08:13:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 215 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424660</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision regarding the cost of acquisition for capital gains tax calculation, emphasizing the legislative language and rejecting the contention based on voluntary valuation. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the authorities&#039; findings and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>