<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 207 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424652</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the criminal petition seeking to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The allegations of offences under various sections of the IPC, including fraudulent transfer and forgery, were deemed triable issues. The court held that vicarious liability requires specific allegations and that contractual disputes can lead to criminal prosecution if dishonest intentions are present. The NCLT&#039;s decision did not bar criminal proceedings, and the collected evidence supported a prima facie case. Legal precedents cited were found inapplicable, and the trial was allowed to proceed for further adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 207 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424652</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the criminal petition seeking to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The allegations of offences under various sections of the IPC, including fraudulent transfer and forgery, were deemed triable issues. The court held that vicarious liability requires specific allegations and that contractual disputes can lead to criminal prosecution if dishonest intentions are present. The NCLT&#039;s decision did not bar criminal proceedings, and the collected evidence supported a prima facie case. Legal precedents cited were found inapplicable, and the trial was allowed to proceed for further adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>