<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 56 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29413</link>
    <description>The court affirmed that the three manuals acquired by the assessee were classified as books and constituted &quot;plant,&quot; qualifying for depreciation and development rebate. The court ruled in favor of the assessee on this issue. However, the court found the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to fix the cost of the manuals at Rs. 25,000 arbitrary and unsupported by facts, not favoring either party on this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:27:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 56 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29413</link>
      <description>The court affirmed that the three manuals acquired by the assessee were classified as books and constituted &quot;plant,&quot; qualifying for depreciation and development rebate. The court ruled in favor of the assessee on this issue. However, the court found the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to fix the cost of the manuals at Rs. 25,000 arbitrary and unsupported by facts, not favoring either party on this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>