<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1344 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303142</link>
    <description>The High Court granted the Plaintiff&#039;s request for interim relief, restraining the Defendants from disposing of or encumbering shares, assets, and properties of a company pending NCLT&#039;s decision on permissions for a Share Purchase Agreement. The court emphasized contract sanctity, rejecting jurisdictional challenges and arguments related to an NCLAT stay order. The balance of convenience favored the Plaintiff, leading to the interim order in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1344 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303142</link>
      <description>The High Court granted the Plaintiff&#039;s request for interim relief, restraining the Defendants from disposing of or encumbering shares, assets, and properties of a company pending NCLT&#039;s decision on permissions for a Share Purchase Agreement. The court emphasized contract sanctity, rejecting jurisdictional challenges and arguments related to an NCLAT stay order. The balance of convenience favored the Plaintiff, leading to the interim order in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>