<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1995 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, setting aside the impugned orders dated 20.05.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Seaport Import), Chennai, due to the lack of jurisdiction of officers of DRI to initiate proceedings under the Customs Act, 1962. The matters were remanded back to the original authority for further adjudication, pending the final resolution of the jurisdiction issue by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:18:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1995 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, setting aside the impugned orders dated 20.05.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Seaport Import), Chennai, due to the lack of jurisdiction of officers of DRI to initiate proceedings under the Customs Act, 1962. The matters were remanded back to the original authority for further adjudication, pending the final resolution of the jurisdiction issue by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>