<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1651 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303131</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the lower appellate court&#039;s judgment and decree. The case was remitted back to the lower appellate court for a reconsideration of the matters on merit, emphasizing the need to follow the discussed principles. The court clarified that the lower appellate court&#039;s power under Order XLI Rule 23-A was not restricted if conditions were met, directing the parties to appear before the lower appellate court on a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:18:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1651 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303131</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the lower appellate court&#039;s judgment and decree. The case was remitted back to the lower appellate court for a reconsideration of the matters on merit, emphasizing the need to follow the discussed principles. The court clarified that the lower appellate court&#039;s power under Order XLI Rule 23-A was not restricted if conditions were met, directing the parties to appear before the lower appellate court on a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>