<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1064 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303136</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petitioners&#039; application for stay of proceedings in the appeal until the decision on their application to set aside the ex-parte decree. The petitioners were directed to hand over possession of the suit property to the respondent within four weeks. The respondent was to maintain an account of proceeds from the property and submit it annually to the Court. The Court noted the petitioners&#039; delaying tactics but granted the stay due to the legal implications of Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:18:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1064 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303136</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petitioners&#039; application for stay of proceedings in the appeal until the decision on their application to set aside the ex-parte decree. The petitioners were directed to hand over possession of the suit property to the respondent within four weeks. The respondent was to maintain an account of proceeds from the property and submit it annually to the Court. The Court noted the petitioners&#039; delaying tactics but granted the stay due to the legal implications of Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>