<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1971 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303139</link>
    <description>An appointment made under the recruitment regime without prior approval of the competent authority was held to be void ab initio, not a mere irregularity, because the appointing officer acted beyond authority and an essential statutory condition was breached. On that basis, the appointee acquired no enforceable right to continue in service. The Court further held that no prior hearing was required before cancelling such a void appointment, since natural justice would be an empty formality where invalidity is admitted from the record. The termination order was therefore upheld, and interference with the cancellation was found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:18:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1971 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303139</link>
      <description>An appointment made under the recruitment regime without prior approval of the competent authority was held to be void ab initio, not a mere irregularity, because the appointing officer acted beyond authority and an essential statutory condition was breached. On that basis, the appointee acquired no enforceable right to continue in service. The Court further held that no prior hearing was required before cancelling such a void appointment, since natural justice would be an empty formality where invalidity is admitted from the record. The termination order was therefore upheld, and interference with the cancellation was found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>