https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303139 The Supreme Court held that the appointment of the respondent as a Veterinary Compounder was void ab initio due to lack of approval from the Competent Authority, making it a nullity. The termination order, citing the illegal appointment, did not require an opportunity of hearing as the appointment was inherently invalid. The Court emphasized that in cases of unauthorized appointments, principles of natural justice do not mandate a hearing. The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision, reinstating the Central Administrative Tribunal's ruling and dismissing the respondent's application. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:18:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303139 The Supreme Court held that the appointment of the respondent as a Veterinary Compounder was void ab initio due to lack of approval from the Competent Authority, making it a nullity. The termination order, citing the illegal appointment, did not require an opportunity of hearing as the appointment was inherently invalid. The Court emphasized that in cases of unauthorized appointments, principles of natural justice do not mandate a hearing. The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision, reinstating the Central Administrative Tribunal's ruling and dismissing the respondent's application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303139