https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303117 The court held that amendments to a decree should be allowed if they are bonafide and do not affect accrued rights. In this case, the amendment sought to correct a clerical error in the description of the property and did not change the identity of the suit land. The court found that the appellants, who were purchasers in the suit land but not entitled to possession, did not suffer prejudice or injustice due to the amendment. Therefore, the court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of allowing the amendment without awarding costs. en-us Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2022 12:37:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303117 The court held that amendments to a decree should be allowed if they are bonafide and do not affect accrued rights. In this case, the amendment sought to correct a clerical error in the description of the property and did not change the identity of the suit land. The court found that the appellants, who were purchasers in the suit land but not entitled to possession, did not suffer prejudice or injustice due to the amendment. Therefore, the court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of allowing the amendment without awarding costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303117