<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 671 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303115</link>
    <description>A candidate who lacked the essential training qualification prescribed by statutory recruitment rules could not claim a valid appointment, and later recognition of equivalence did not cure the defect. Administrative instructions or advertisements could not override the statutory qualification requirements, so the appointment remained contrary to the rules. Cancellation issued shortly after appointment without prior notice or hearing was not vitiated because the action was non-punitive, carried no stigma, and no real prejudice was shown. The challenge therefore failed, and the cancellation was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 11:55:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 671 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303115</link>
      <description>A candidate who lacked the essential training qualification prescribed by statutory recruitment rules could not claim a valid appointment, and later recognition of equivalence did not cure the defect. Administrative instructions or advertisements could not override the statutory qualification requirements, so the appointment remained contrary to the rules. Cancellation issued shortly after appointment without prior notice or hearing was not vitiated because the action was non-punitive, carried no stigma, and no real prejudice was shown. The challenge therefore failed, and the cancellation was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>