<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 187 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424632</link>
    <description>Bail was granted in proceedings arising from an alleged offence under the CGST Act after the Court considered the period of custody, the nature of the allegation, the amount stated to have been deposited, and the stage of the proceedings. The Court made clear that it was not expressing any opinion on the merits while deciding the application. The petitioner was found entitled to be enlarged on bail, subject to furnishing the required bond and sureties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 187 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424632</link>
      <description>Bail was granted in proceedings arising from an alleged offence under the CGST Act after the Court considered the period of custody, the nature of the allegation, the amount stated to have been deposited, and the stage of the proceedings. The Court made clear that it was not expressing any opinion on the merits while deciding the application. The petitioner was found entitled to be enlarged on bail, subject to furnishing the required bond and sureties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>