https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424630 The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging an audit report that determined 18% GST applicable on a government works contract instead of 12% as claimed by the petitioner. The court found the petition premature as the audit report under Section 65(6) of CGST Act was merely a preliminary step requiring further adjudication, not a final recovery order. The respondent authority confirmed no immediate recovery action would be taken. While dismissing the petition, the court extended the deadline for the petitioner to submit its reply to the tax demand, ensuring adequate opportunity to present its case before final determination of tax liability. en-us Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 12:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424630 The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging an audit report that determined 18% GST applicable on a government works contract instead of 12% as claimed by the petitioner. The court found the petition premature as the audit report under Section 65(6) of CGST Act was merely a preliminary step requiring further adjudication, not a final recovery order. The respondent authority confirmed no immediate recovery action would be taken. While dismissing the petition, the court extended the deadline for the petitioner to submit its reply to the tax demand, ensuring adequate opportunity to present its case before final determination of tax liability. Case-Laws GST Fri, 24 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424630