<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 173 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424618</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was not obligated to deduct TDS on External Development Charges (EDC) payments made to HUDA, considering HUDA as an executing agency for the Government. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act was deemed unjustified and was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 173 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424618</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was not obligated to deduct TDS on External Development Charges (EDC) payments made to HUDA, considering HUDA as an executing agency for the Government. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act was deemed unjustified and was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>