<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 171 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting the deduction of the embezzlement loss in the relevant assessment year 2008-09. The assessee&#039;s claim for the write-off of the embezzled amount was upheld as it was deemed that the loss occurred when it was realized that recovery was not possible, despite the embezzlement being discovered earlier. The embezzlement loss was held to be deductible in the assessment year 2008-09.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:16:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 171 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting the deduction of the embezzlement loss in the relevant assessment year 2008-09. The assessee&#039;s claim for the write-off of the embezzled amount was upheld as it was deemed that the loss occurred when it was realized that recovery was not possible, despite the embezzlement being discovered earlier. The embezzlement loss was held to be deductible in the assessment year 2008-09.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>