<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 163 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424608</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was invalid due to the vague penalty notice lacking specificity on the limb of penalty. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal found the notice deficient and concluded that the penalty was not leviable. As a result, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:16:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 163 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424608</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was invalid due to the vague penalty notice lacking specificity on the limb of penalty. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal found the notice deficient and concluded that the penalty was not leviable. As a result, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>