<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 161 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424606</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling that Flat Nos.201 &amp;amp; 202 constituted a single residential house, qualifying for exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act. However, Flat No.301 was deemed a separate unit and not eligible for the exemption. The decision emphasized the significance of physical verification and the layout of residential units in determining eligibility for tax exemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 161 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424606</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling that Flat Nos.201 &amp;amp; 202 constituted a single residential house, qualifying for exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act. However, Flat No.301 was deemed a separate unit and not eligible for the exemption. The decision emphasized the significance of physical verification and the layout of residential units in determining eligibility for tax exemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>