<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 150 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424595</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order transferring Company Petitions to the Chandigarh Bench, emphasizing that the power to transfer cases lies with the President. The matters were directed to be reassigned by the President under Rule 16(d) of the NCLT Rules, 2016. The Tribunal clarified the President&#039;s jurisdiction in reassignment, highlighting the importance of the President&#039;s role in such decisions. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the survival of CP No. 144/2016 for adjudication and maintained the stay order on the operation of the impugned order dated 02.09.2021, remitting the matter to the President for further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 150 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424595</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order transferring Company Petitions to the Chandigarh Bench, emphasizing that the power to transfer cases lies with the President. The matters were directed to be reassigned by the President under Rule 16(d) of the NCLT Rules, 2016. The Tribunal clarified the President&#039;s jurisdiction in reassignment, highlighting the importance of the President&#039;s role in such decisions. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the survival of CP No. 144/2016 for adjudication and maintained the stay order on the operation of the impugned order dated 02.09.2021, remitting the matter to the President for further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>