<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 146 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424591</link>
    <description>The petition CP(IB) No. 2185/KB/2019 was dismissed as barred by limitation. The tribunal rejected the Operational Creditor&#039;s argument for condonation of delay and held that there was no sufficient cause for not filing the petition within the prescribed period. The main petition was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the statutory limitation period in initiating insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:15:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 146 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424591</link>
      <description>The petition CP(IB) No. 2185/KB/2019 was dismissed as barred by limitation. The tribunal rejected the Operational Creditor&#039;s argument for condonation of delay and held that there was no sufficient cause for not filing the petition within the prescribed period. The main petition was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the statutory limitation period in initiating insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>