https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424586 The court concluded that the petitioner, not being an accused in the predicate offences or ECIRs and having been a minor during the alleged offenses, the preventive/detentive Look Out Circular (LOC) was unjustified. The LOC was modified to an intimation LOC, allowing the petitioner to travel abroad with notification to the authorities. The court emphasized that the petitioner should not be detained or restricted from traveling under the pretext of intimation. The petition was disposed of, with the expectation that the respondents adhere to the guidelines in the Office Memorandum dated 27th October 2010. en-us Mon, 04 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:15:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424586 The court concluded that the petitioner, not being an accused in the predicate offences or ECIRs and having been a minor during the alleged offenses, the preventive/detentive Look Out Circular (LOC) was unjustified. The LOC was modified to an intimation LOC, allowing the petitioner to travel abroad with notification to the authorities. The court emphasized that the petitioner should not be detained or restricted from traveling under the pretext of intimation. The petition was disposed of, with the expectation that the respondents adhere to the guidelines in the Office Memorandum dated 27th October 2010. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 04 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424586