https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424583 The Tribunal held that the buyer's premises could not be considered the "place of removal" for excise duty purposes. Therefore, the inclusion of freight charges in the assessable value of goods was deemed incorrect. The appeal was allowed, and the demand for duty, interest, and penalty was set aside. en-us Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:15:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424583 The Tribunal held that the buyer's premises could not be considered the "place of removal" for excise duty purposes. Therefore, the inclusion of freight charges in the assessable value of goods was deemed incorrect. The appeal was allowed, and the demand for duty, interest, and penalty was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424583