<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 137 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424582</link>
    <description>The judgment by Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth allowed the Writ Petition challenging the assessment order dated 19.04.2022, which denied Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Section 19(2)(v) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The court held that the amendment to Section 19(2)(v) was curative and declaratory, with retrospective effect, benefiting dealers in interstate sales. The impugned assessment order was set aside, affirming the petitioner&#039;s right to ITC for inputs used in manufacturing within the State, regardless of subsequent sales. The petitioner was granted relief, and the case was closed with no costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:14:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 137 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424582</link>
      <description>The judgment by Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth allowed the Writ Petition challenging the assessment order dated 19.04.2022, which denied Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Section 19(2)(v) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The court held that the amendment to Section 19(2)(v) was curative and declaratory, with retrospective effect, benefiting dealers in interstate sales. The impugned assessment order was set aside, affirming the petitioner&#039;s right to ITC for inputs used in manufacturing within the State, regardless of subsequent sales. The petitioner was granted relief, and the case was closed with no costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>