<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 135 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424580</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of a petition challenging GST investigation proceedings involving alleged evasion of Rs.9 crores. The court noted extreme bitterness between parties and petitioners&#039; apprehension of arrest, but respondents categorically stated no arrest was intended as they sought revenue recovery. While acknowledging respondents&#039; investigation powers, the court emphasized investigations cannot continue indefinitely. Petitioners had already paid Rs.4.10 crores against the disputed amount, exceeding the statutory 10% requirement for appeal admission. The court directed petitioners to cooperate with investigation and respond to summons, while continuing the interim order restraining coercive steps until investigation concludes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 135 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424580</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of a petition challenging GST investigation proceedings involving alleged evasion of Rs.9 crores. The court noted extreme bitterness between parties and petitioners&#039; apprehension of arrest, but respondents categorically stated no arrest was intended as they sought revenue recovery. While acknowledging respondents&#039; investigation powers, the court emphasized investigations cannot continue indefinitely. Petitioners had already paid Rs.4.10 crores against the disputed amount, exceeding the statutory 10% requirement for appeal admission. The court directed petitioners to cooperate with investigation and respond to summons, while continuing the interim order restraining coercive steps until investigation concludes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>