https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303106 The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the assessment orders for Assessment Years 2012-2013 to 2016-2017, and directed the Assessing Officer to redo the assessment after granting the petitioner a personal hearing within six weeks. The judgment emphasizes the importance of procedural fairness in tax assessments, highlighting the right of taxpayers to present their case and contest assessments, particularly when issues of liability are involved. The decision underscores the significance of due process and timely resolution of tax disputes while upholding principles of natural justice. en-us Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:12:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303106 The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the assessment orders for Assessment Years 2012-2013 to 2016-2017, and directed the Assessing Officer to redo the assessment after granting the petitioner a personal hearing within six weeks. The judgment emphasizes the importance of procedural fairness in tax assessments, highlighting the right of taxpayers to present their case and contest assessments, particularly when issues of liability are involved. The decision underscores the significance of due process and timely resolution of tax disputes while upholding principles of natural justice. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303106