https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303111 High Court writ jurisdiction will not be used to reappraise concurrent findings of fact recorded by the adjudicating, appellate and revisional authorities where the revisional authority has examined the record, addressed the matter on facts and given cogent reasons. In such circumstances, the court will not substitute its own view merely to provide a further forum of review. The revisional authority's reasoned factual conclusions were accepted, and interference was declined because the findings below were concurrent and supported by evidence. en-us Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:12:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303111 High Court writ jurisdiction will not be used to reappraise concurrent findings of fact recorded by the adjudicating, appellate and revisional authorities where the revisional authority has examined the record, addressed the matter on facts and given cogent reasons. In such circumstances, the court will not substitute its own view merely to provide a further forum of review. The revisional authority's reasoned factual conclusions were accepted, and interference was declined because the findings below were concurrent and supported by evidence. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303111