<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1392 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303112</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was refused in a GST evasion matter because the allegations disclosed a serious economic offence affecting the financial system. The Court considered the nature of the tax-evasion accusations, the surrounding circumstances, and the settled approach that economic offences warrant strict scrutiny before bail is granted. On that basis, it held that the case was not fit for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1392 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303112</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was refused in a GST evasion matter because the allegations disclosed a serious economic offence affecting the financial system. The Court considered the nature of the tax-evasion accusations, the surrounding circumstances, and the settled approach that economic offences warrant strict scrutiny before bail is granted. On that basis, it held that the case was not fit for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>